Political Culture and Democratic Transition: A Reassessment
Keywords:
Political Culture, Civic Culture, Democracy, Democratic Transition, Public EthicsAbstract
This paper explores the concept of political culture and its origins, establishing four main theses. First, the nature of a country's system of government cannot be concluded from its political culture. Second, political culture cannot be extrapolated from the broader general culture. Third, direct conclusions about political practice are unlikely to be drawn from political culture. And fourth, the impact of the political culture of elites during the democratic transition should not be underestimated. The paper addresses the importance of both “civic culture” in preserving democratic stability and the belief in liberal democratic values. It makes a distinction between political culture as attitudes and as behavioural trends. It contends that the emergence of theories linking the nature of the system of government to the prevalent culture in a given country was due to Cold War alliances between Western democracies and their loyal dictatorships. There is no truth to the claim that the political culture of a society must be democratic as a precondition for establishing a democratic system. Conversely, this assumption obscures the true condition for democracy, which is the political culture of the elites, and the latter’s adherence to democratic principles during the democratization process.
References
- Sidney Verba, “Comparative Political Culture,” in: Lucian W. Pye & Sidney Verba (eds.), Political Culture and Political Development (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1965), p. 513.
- Gabriel Almond, “Comparative Political Systems,” The Journal of Politics , vol. 18, no. 3 (August 1956), p. 396.
- Azmi Bishara, Fī al-Masʾala al-ʿArabiyya: Muqaddima li-Bayān Dīmuqrātī ʿArabī , 4th ed. (Doha/Beirut: Arab Centre for Research and Policy Studies, 2018), p. 135. See also: Gabriel A. Almond & Sidney Verba, The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1963), pp. 12-13.
- Azmi Bishara, al-Intiqāl al-Dīmuqrāṭī wa-Ishkāliyyātuh: Dirāsa Nadhariyya wa-Taṭbīqiyya Muqārana (Beirut/Doha: Arab Centre for Research and Policy Studies, 2020), p. 420. See also: Sidney Verba, “On Revisiting the Civic Culture: A Personal Postscript,” in: Gabriel A. Almond & Sidney Verba, The Civic Culture Revisited (Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1989), pp. 394-410.
- Of course, pace Almond and Verba, people’s attitudes cannot be neatly divided into cognitive, emotional/affective, and evaluative. These may be distinct aspects of a single attitude, supportive or critical of political conditions. All of these faculties overlap when forming an attitude or position on an issue, person, policy, or institution.
- Almond & Verba, The Civic Culture , p. 18.
- Ibid., pp. 341-346.
- Pippa Norris & Ronald Inglehart, Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019), p. 422.
- Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America , Henry Reeve (trans.), vol. 1 (New York: Schocken Books, 1961), p. 379. See also: Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America , Eduardo Nolla (ed.), James T. Schleifer (trans.), vol. 1 (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2012), pp. 466-467.
- Sittlichkeit is derived from “sitten”, meaning mores.
- Bishara, al-Intiqāl al-Dīmuqrāṭī wa-Ishkāliyyātuh , p. 409.
- Stephen Welch, The Theory of Political Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), p. 186.
- Leon Festinger, A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1985 [1957]), p. 260.
- Dankwart A. Rustow, “Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model,” Comparative Politics , vol. 2, no. 3 (April 1970), p. 344.
- Dankwart A. Rustow, A World of Nations: Problems of Political Modernization (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1973 [1967]), p. 233.
- Joseph A. Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (London/New York: Routledge, 1996 [1942]), pp. 232-302, esp. 294, 295; Max Weber, Essays in Sociology (New York: Oxford University Press, 1946). These ideas are discussed on pp. 290-295, in addition to the need for some institutions, such as the judiciary and the army, to be exempted from electoral politics.
- Bishara, al-Intiqāl al-Dīmuqrāṭī.
- Herbert McClosky, “Consensus and Ideology in American Politics,” American Political Science Review , vol. 58, no. 2 (June 1964), pp. 361, 372-379. McClosky represents the view that consensus among voters is based on abstract principles rather than democratic attitudes towards specific issues and problems. In this view, the basis for that consensus among voters is the consensus between educated elites and those with political influence.
- Larry Diamond, “Conclusion: Causes and Effects,” in: Larry Diamond (ed.), Political Culture and Democracy in Developing Countries (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1993), p. 430.
- This and subsequent sections are a reworking of the chapter on political culture from my al-Intiqāl al-Dīmuqrāṭī wa-Ishkāliyyātuh. Some passages are taken directly from that text, while others have been revised.
- This is in contrast to the socio-historical approach of Shmuel Noah Eisenstadt (1923-2010), who distinguished between civilizations that had evolved mechanisms for government accountability and others that did not as religions emerged in Axial Age. See: Shmuel Noah Eisenstadt, “Cultural Traditions and Political Dynamics: The Origins of Modes of Ideological Politics,” British Journal of Sociology, vol. 32, no. 2 (June 1981), pp. 155-181.
- Theda Skocpol, “A Critical Review of Barrington Moore’s Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy,” Politics and Society , vol. 4, no. 1 (September 1973), pp. 1, 34.
- Bishara, al-Intiqāl al-Dīmuqrāṭī wa-Ishkāliyyātuh , p. 146.
- Barrington Moore Jr., Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World , with a new foreword by Edward Friedman and James C. Scott (Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1993 [1966]), p. 486.
- Ibid., pp. 117-118.
- Tocqueville, Democracy in America , Eduardo Nolla (ed.), pp. 53-54, 59-61.
- Ibid., p. 52; Bishara, al-Intiqāl al-Dīmuqrāṭī wa-Ishkāliyyātuh , pp. 416-417.
- Elie Kedourie, Democracy and Arab Political Culture (London: Frank Cass, 1994), p. 8.
- Ibid., pp. 85-86.
- Fuad Ishaq Khoury, al-Dhihniya al-ʿArabiyya: al-ʿUnf Sayyid al-Aḥkām (Beirut/London: Dar al-Saqi, 1993).
- Muhammad Hafiz Yaqub, al-ʿAṭab wa-l-Dalāla: fī al-Thaqāfa wa-l-Insidād al-Dīmuqrāṭī (Ramallah: Palestinian Institute for Democracy Studies, 1997), pp. 132-145. I will simply note my agreement with Yaqub’s response to Laroui regarding the “sultanic mindset” as a timeless aspect of Arab culture. The purpose of this study is not to critique the Arabic literature on the topic, but simply to refute the idea that a democratic or pro-democracy culture is a necessary precondition for the democratic transition.
- Hisham Sharabi, al-Naqd al-Ḥadārī li-l-Mujtamaʿ al-ʿArabī fī Nihāyat al-Qarn al-ʿIshrīn (Beirut: Centre for Arab Unity Studies, 1999), p. 10.
Downloads
Published
Usage statistics
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Almuntaqa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.