Ta'ifah, Sect and Sectarianism: from the Word and its Changing Implications to the Analytical Sociological Term

المؤلفون

  • المؤلف

  • Azmi Bishara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31430/almuntaqa.1.2.0053

الملخص

This article, a chapter from the author's recently published book (March 2018) titled, Ta'ifah, Sectarianism and Imagined Sects , attempts to build fundamental conceptual idiomatic distinctions between community according to religious or confessional affiliation ( at-tai'fah ), sectarianism ( at-ta'ifiyyah ) and confessionalism ( al-madhabiyyah ) – concepts and phenomena that are deeply intertwined. The author also explores related concepts such as identity, religious affiliation, sect, difference, fanaticism ( taasub ), and others. Bishara analyzes the linguistic and semantic conceptual evolution of the term sectarianism, as well as the evolution of the term through the concepts of confession/group ( firqa ), sect ( tai'fa ), and craft ( hirfa ) - concepts that reflect on the ways ( turuq ), the occupational and professional congregations as well as the Sufi orders, within Islamic society. All of these developments are examined to reach an understanding of the widespread modern Arabic term sectarianism - sectarianism being a modern term, and sect an old one. Through a critical debate with the modern Western sociological concepts of sectarianism ( al-ta'ifiyyah or al-firqiyyah ), the study attempts to develop the term “sect” as an analytical sociological term that can be used to analyze the formation, evolution, and characteristics of new contemporary imagined communities, according to religious communities that the author calls imagined sects in his book. One of the major theses in this work is that modern religious communities (tawa'if: plural of tai'fah ) do not produce sectarianism; rather, it is sectarianism which breeds the imagined communities that the author calls imagined sects.

المراجع

8إجمالي الاستشهادات
0من دوريات المركز
7من مصادر خارجية

مقالات مُستشهِدة من مصادر خارجية (7)

  1. Fatimah Saadi, Tània Verge (2026) An Intersectional Theory of Gendered Political Violence Under Sectarian Systems. Politics & Gender, 1 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X26101111
  2. Anne Kirstine Rønn (2026) Contesting Consociationalism in Bosnia–Herzegovina and Lebanon: Exploring Differences in Protest Frames. Ethnopolitics, 25(2), 173 https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2024.2412504
  3. Charles Harb (2025) From protests to polls: A study on voting intentions in Lebanon. Political Psychology, 46(5), 1227 https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.13072
  4. Anne Kirstine Rønn (2025) Mapping the Relationships Between Sect and Class. Ethnopolitics, 1 https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2025.2525660
  5. Ayesha Jawad, Shaffaf Shahid Latif (2025) Unravelling Radicalisation. Crime Prevention and Security Management, 221 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-91887-2_11
  6. Hiba Ghanem (2021) Spatial profanation of lebanese sectarianism: al-nūr square and the 17 October 2019 protests. Journal for Cultural Research, 25(2), 160 https://doi.org/10.1080/14797585.2021.1899891
  7. Morten Valbjørn (2020) Countering Sectarianism: The Many Paths, Promises, and Pitfalls of De-sectarianization. The Review of Faith & International Affairs, 18(1), 12 https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2020.1729550

المصادر: Crossref Cited-by، ومراجع مقالات دوريات المركز (الهوامش وقوائم المراجع). لا يمكن عرض 1 من الأعمال المُستشهِدة (مسوّدات بحثية لم تُودَع بياناتها كاملة)

منشور

2018-05-01

إحصاءات الاستخدام

44 مشاهدة 64 تنزيل

إصدار

القسم

المقالات