The Teacher in New Sociologies of Education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31430/vayj4206

Keywords:

Teachers, Role of Teachers, Social and Educational Inequality, Educational Reform, Sociology of Education

Abstract

The emergence of new sociologies in the field of education has marked a significant epistemological turning point in the historical development of approaches to the dialectical relationship between “educational” and “social” matters. Within this framework, schools are central to unpacking social and educational inequalities, particularly with regard to the organization of school knowledge and classroom interactions. A key focus within this inquiry has been on teachers, regarded as active agents in any educational reform. They have come to represent both the foundation of educational change and a primary entry point for new sociological research on schooling. This article explores how new sociologies of education have addressed the role of teachers – highlighting, on the one hand, their centrality in driving educational transformation, and on the other, the value of sociological knowledge about teachers in fostering their critical reflexivity and motivating their engagement in deconstructing, analysing and dismantling the processes through which schooling reproduces educational inequalities.

References

  1. Willard Waller, The Sociology of Teaching (New York: J. Wiley & Sons, 1932).
  2. Edward F. Pajak, "Willard Waller’s Sociology of Teaching Reconsidered: 'What Does Teaching Do to Teachers?'" American Educational Research Journal , vol. 49, no. 6 (2012), p. 1183.
  3. Pierre Bourdieu & Jean–Claude Passeron, La Reproduction: Eléments pour une théorie du système d’enseignement (Paris: Minuit, 1970).
  4. Pierre Dandurand & Émile Ollivier, "Les paradigmes perdus: Essai sur la sociologie de l’éducation et son objet," Sociologie et sociétés , vol. 19, no. 2 (Octobre 1987), p. 87.
  5. Michael F. D. Young, "Du 'curriculum en tant que construction sociale' à la spécialisation intégrative’: Quelques réflexions sur la sociologie du curriculum au Royaume–Uni (1971–1999)," Revue française de pédagogie , no. 135 (2001), pp. 29–30.
  6. Sara Delamont, "Two 'New' Sociologies of Education: A Comment on Heap’sDiscourse in the Production of Classroom Knowledge," Curriculum Inquiry , vol. 16, no. 3 (1986), pp. 327–329.
  7. Jean–Claude Forquin, "La 'nouvelle Sociologie de l’Éducation' En Grande–Bretagne: Orientations, Apports Théoriques, Évolution (1970–1980)," Revue Française de Pédagogie , vol. 63 (1983), pp. 61–79; Claude Trottier, "La 'Nouvelle' sociologie de l’éducation en Grande–Bretagne: Un mouvement de pensée en voie de dissolution?" Revue française de pédagogie , vol. 78 (1987). pp. 5–20.
  8. Michael F. D. Young, The Curriculum of the Future: From the 'New Sociology of Education ' to a Critical Theory of Learning (Lewes: Falmer Press, 2002 [1998]), p. 38.
  9. Peter Woods & Martyn Hammersley (eds.), School Experience: Explorations in the Sociology of Education (New York: St. Martins Press, 1977), pp. 9–10.
  10. Delamont, p. 329.
  11. Claude Lessard, "La sociologie de l’éducation dans les sciences de l’éducation québécoise," Cahiers de recherche sociologique, no. 64 (Hiver 2018), pp. 48–49.
  12. Charles Percy Snow, The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution (New York: Cambridge University Press,
  13. Lawrence J. Saha, "The 'New' Sociology of Education and the Study of Learning Environments: Prospects and Problems," Acta Sociologica , vol. 21, no. 1 (1978), p. 47.
  14. Michael F. D. Young (ed.), Knowledge and Control: New Directions for the Sociology of Education (London: Collier–Macmillan, 1971).
  15. Bourdieu & Passeron.
  16. Delamont, p. 328.
  17. Delamont, p. 328.
  18. Young, "Du 'curriculum en tant que construction sociale' à la 'spécialisation intégrative'," p. 29.
  19. Young, The Curriculum of the Future , p. 36.
  20. Young, "Du 'curriculum en tant que construction sociale' à la 'spécialisation intégrative'," p. 30.
  21. Karl Polanyi, The Great Transformation (New York: Farrar & Rinehart, 1944).
  22. Young, "Du 'curriculum en tant que construction sociale' à la 'spécialisation intégrative'," p. 31.
  23. Ibid., pp. 31–32.
  24. Young, The Curriculum of the Future , p. 42.
  25. Young, The Curriculum of the Future , pp. 40–45.
  26. Young, "Du 'curriculum en tant que construction sociale' à la 'spécialisation intégrative'," p. 30.
  27. Woods & Hammersley.
  28. Delamont, p. 328.
  29. Woods & Hammersley, p. 10.
  30. Rob Walker, "The Sociology of Education and Life in School Classrooms," International Review of Education / Internationale Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft /Revue Internationale de l’Education , vol. 18, no. 1 (1972), p. 37.
  31. Woods & Hammersley, p. 24.
  32. Julie McLeod, "The 'New Sociology of Education', Then and Now: Looking Back to the 1970s and ahead to Today," Curric u lum Perspectives , vol. 43 (2023), p. 185.
  33. Young, The Curriculum of the Future , p. 41.
  34. Ibid., pp. 40–41.
  35. Ibid., pp. 41–43.
  36. Delamont, p. 328.
  37. Claude Trottier & Claude Lessard, "La place de l’enseignement de la sociologie de l’éducation dans les programmes de formation des enseignants au Québec: Etude de cas inspirée d’une sociologie du curriculum," Éducation et Sociétés , vol. 9, no. 1 (2002), p. 54.
  38. Peter Woods, Inside Schools: Ethnography in Educational Research (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986).
  39. Delamont, pp. 327–329.
  40. Jerome Kagan, The Three Cultures: Natural Sciences, Social Sciences and the Humanities in the 21st Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).
  41. Delamont, p. 329.
  42. Richard J. Bates, "Educational Critique, The New Sociology of Education, and the Work of Teachers," The Journal of Education , vol. 163, no. 4 (1981), p. 309.
  43. Richard J. Bates, "What can The New Sociology of Education do for Teachers?" Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education , vol. 1, no. 2 (1981), pp. 46–47.
  44. Ibid., pp. 47–48.
  45. Ibid., pp. 48–49.
  46. Ibid., pp. 49–51.
  47. Georges Felouzis, Les inégalités scolaires (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2020), p. 66.

Published

2026-04-01

Article dates

Received: March 31, 2025 Revised: July 6, 2025 Accepted: August 26, 2025

Usage statistics

40 views 107 downloads

Issue

Section

Discussions