The End of America: The End of American World Order and Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, Transformation of the American World Order

Authors

  • Author

  • Amina Mostefa Della Hassiba Benbouali University, Chlef

Keywords:

World Order, United States of America, Liberalism

Abstract

​عنوان الكتاب الأول بلغته الأصلية: The End of American World Order. عنوان الكتاب: نهاية النظام العالمي الأميركي. المؤلف: أميتاف أشاريا Amitav Acharya. دار النشر: Polity. سنة النشر: 2018. عدد الصفحات: 138. عنوان الكتاب الثاني بلغته الأصلية: Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. عنوان الكتاب: اللفياثان الليبرالي: أصول وأزمة وتحول النظام العالمي الأميركي. المؤلف: جون إكنبري Gilford John Ikenberry. دار النشر: Princeton University Press. سنة النشر: 2011. عدد الصفحات: 372.

Author Biography

  • Amina Mostefa Della, Hassiba Benbouali University, Chlef
    Professor of Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Hassiba Benbouali University, Chlef, Algeria.

References

  1. Josef Joffe, The Myth of America's Decline: Politics, Economics, and a Half Century of False Prophecies (New York: Liveright, 2014), pp. 1 - 2.
  2. G. John Ikenberry, Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order (Princeton University Press, 2011), p. 47.
  3. Ibid., pp. 167 - 193.
  4. Amitav Acharya, The End of American World Order , 2nd ed. (UK: Polity, 2018), p. xiii.
  5. Isabelle Grunberg, "Exploring the 'Myth' of Hegemonic Stability," International Organization , vol. 44, no. 4 (Autumn 1990), p. 437.
  6. Kathryn Sikkink, "Latin American Countries as Norm Protagonists of the Idea of International Human Rights," Global Governance, vol. 20, no. 3 (2014), pp. 389 - 404.
  7. Eric Helleiner, Forgotten Foundations of Bretton Woods: International Development and the Making of the Post war Order (New York: Cornell University Press, 2014)
  8. Acharya, pp. 42 - 43.
  9. Edward Mansfield & Jack Snyder, "Democratization and the Danger of War," International Security , vol. 20, no.1 (Summer 1995), p. 5.
  10. G. John Ikenberry, "The end of liberal international order?" International Affairs , vol. 94, no. 1 (January 2018), p. 17.
  11. G. John Ikenberry, "The Rise of China and the Future of the West: Can the Liberal System Survive?" Foreign Affairs , vol. 87, no. 1 (January-February 2008), p. 32.
  12. Randall L. Schweller & Xiaoyu Pu, "After Unipolarity: China's Visions of International Order in an Era of U.S. Decline," International Security , vol. 36, no.1 (Summer 2011), pp. 52 - 53.
  13. Amitav Acharya, "After Liberal Hegemony: The Advent of a Multiplex World Order," Ethics & International Affairs , vol. 31, no. 3 (2017), p. 275.
  14. Acharya, The End of American World Order , pp. 47 - 48.
  15. Kristen Hopewell, Breaking the WTO: How Emerging Powers Disrupted the Neoliberal Project (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2016), p. 3.
  16. G. John Ikenberry, "Why the Liberal World Order Will Survive," Ethics & International Affairs , vol. 32, Special Issue. no. 1, Rising Powers and the International Order (Spring 2018), pp. 24 - 25.
  17. G. John Ikenberry, "Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order," Perspectives on Politics , vol. 7, no. 1 (March 2009), pp. 71 - 87.
  18. Acharya, The End of American World Order , p. 9.
  19. Amitav Acharya, Constructing Global Order Agency and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), p. 13.
  20. Amitav Acharya, "Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for International Studies," International Studies Quarterly , vol. 58, no. 4 (2014), pp. 647–659.
  21. Yaqing Qin, "Why is there no Chinese international relations theory?" in: Amitav Acharya & Barry Buzan (eds.), Non-Western International Relations Theory Perspectives on and beyond Asia (England: Routledge, 2010), p. 42.
  22. June Teufel Dreyer, "The 'Tianxia Trope': Will China Change the International System?" Journal of Contemporary China , vol. 24, no. 96 (2015), p. 2.
  23. الأدفايتا هي فلسفة هندية قديمة تعني "اللاثنائية"، أي عدم الإيمان بأن العالم وما فيه من ظواهر يتشكل من ثنائيات.
  24. Deepshikha Shahi & Gennaro Ascione, "Rethinking the Absence of Post-Western International Relations Theory in India: 'Advaitic monism' as an Alternative Epistemological Eesource," European Journal of International Relations , vol. 1, no. 22 (2015), p. 14.
  25. مصطلح سنسكريتي يشير إلى مجموعة الرموز الهندسية التي اعتمدها الهنود القدماء لتقديم صورة الكون.
  26. Medha Bisht, "The Concept of 'Order' in Arthashastra: Re-engaging the Text," South Asian Survey , vol. 21, no. 1 - 2 (2017), p. 220.
  27. Ibid., pp. 221 - 222.
  28. رسخت الكتابات العربية والغربية مفهوم "الجهاد" أساسًا لفهم التنظير الإسلامي الدولي الذي يفرض لزامًا تقسيمً فرضيًا بين عوالم مختلفة، انظر: خديجة أبو أتلة، الإسلام والعلاقات الدولية في السلم والحرب (القاهرة: دار المعارف، 1983)؛ وهبة الزحيلي، العلاقات الدولية في الإسلام (بيروت: مؤسسة الرسالة، 1981)؛ Majid Khadduri, The Islamic Law of Nations: Shaybani's Siyar (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1966); Majid Khadduri, War and Peace in the Law of Islam (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1955).
  29. لمدة عشر سنوات، قام عدد من أساتذة العلوم السياسية من تخصصات مختلفة بتقديم "مشروع العلاقات الدولية في الإسلام"، وقد صدر منه 12 كتابًا عن المعهد العالمي للفكر الإسلامي. للتفاصيل أكثر، انظر: نادية محمود مصطفى، العلاقات الدولية في الإسلام، ج 1، المقدمة العامة للمشروع (القاهرة: المعهد العالمي للفكر الإسلامي،.)1996
  30. Ali Akbar Alikhani, "Fundamentals of Islam in International Relations," in: Deina Abdelkader, Nassef Manabilang Adiong & Raffaele Mauriello (eds.), Islam and International Relations Contributions to Theory and Practice (UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016), pp. 7 - 21.

Downloads

PDF (Hosted in Arabic)
HTML (Arabic)

Published

2019-01-01

Usage statistics

35 views 56 downloads

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 036 (2019): Issue 036

Section

Book Reviews

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Amina Mostefa Della (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.